by Julie Grisolano
Over the course of the past few months, the Signs of the Times blog has featured numerous comments from readers and writers debating the point as to how far is too far in calling out the bad philosophies, the atrocious lies, and unruly behavior of our fellow citizens. While some readers love the fake ads in the magazine that poke fun at some of the ridiculous ideas permeating our culture, others have found that they cross the line into the realm of being "uncharitable." Does the idea of "Christian/brotherly love" mean never having to say someone else is wrong? Since someone here passed me the conch, I'm going to weigh in.
Charity or Christian love, or whatever you choose to call it, doesn't mean that one has to turn a blind eye to what I will refer to here as immoral behavior. There's a saying that goes something like, "Love the sinner, not the sin." This phrase gets twisted and misused quite a lot. A few years ago I remember a friend telling me that she attended a rally in Chicago defending traditional marriage, and opposing protesters shouted at her screaming, "but the Bible says, 'Judge Not Lest You be Judged.'"
Yep, the Bible says that. In fact, Christ said it. But as any good English major knows, you've got to read the whole paragraph and contextualize the phrase in order to understand the full meaning of what the author intended. And the lines following say, "You're sins are forgiven. Go out and sin no more."
When non-Christians, or Christians, bandy about Christian doctrine to defend their immoral behavior, they usually revert to the line above and also the concept of Christian love. This usually means that people want to take Christ's words, and use them as a blank check to get away with bad behavior, because, well, God loves them no matter what, so therefore anything goes.
People reading this blog come from various faith traditions. Some come from no traditions at all, so I can't speak for everyone, but my understanding of mere Christianity is that yes, Christ loves everyone, and yes, we all sin and we all fall short, but He continues to love us anyway---even though we don't really deserve it and we sometimes choose not to love Him back. But like most parents, He doesn't always like what we do, nor does He think that our choices are the best ones, or, since I've been speaking about morality here, He doesn't think our choices are the "right" ones. How do I know this? Well, we have a book that Christians base their faith off, and although there are numerous interpretations, it's pretty clear about certain things. Like in the phrase mentioned in the paragraph above. Christ admonishes people from judging the sinner, but then He turns to the sinner, tells her He forgives the fact that she sinned, but likewise, admonishes HER by telling her not to do it again. It's sort of like a parent who steps in when the siblings are arguing, breaks it up, tells the victimized sibling that all will be ok, but boy kid, don't purposefully go out and do stuff like that anymore.
Although some of Salvo's critics like to call us a Christian rag, we don't proselytize. (It would be fairly difficult to do since our writers come from a myriad of Christian traditions.) But we do believe that there is an ultimate truth---an absolute Truth. And this truth can be found.
So if we believe that, and believe that there is a right and wrong, then it's really a duty to call out the wrong and point people to the right. If we didn't, then we'd be cowards.
There's a great line in Emma, a Jane Austen book, that I think applies to situations like this. The main character, Emma, has denigrated an old lady friend who is a silly, poor, spinster---to their entire party of picnic revelers. Emma did wrong and her best friend and neighbor, Mr. Knightley, pulls her aside and chastises her:
This is not pleasant to you, Emma--and it is very far from pleasant to me; but I must, I will,--I will tell you truths while I can; satisfied with proving myself your friend by very faithful counsel...
Real friendship...real love, means you point people to the truth---you don't let them wander around in the darkness. And sometimes you do it with a little humor too.


I completely agree with your entry. I also believe this latest Salvo is the best yet (maybe because it is the most relevant in my life at the moment...my 4th kiddo just leaving for college). About the 'ads': there are times they are a little over-the-top for me but I am not your true target audience. It seems it would be appropriate to somehow make them easily distinguished as fake, such as some sort of universal outline or color. The fact that they appear so real would make me think twice if I were wanting to sponsor a real ad. All said,Keep up the good fight!!
Posted by: gayle | June 05, 2008 at 06:15 AM
Seriously gayle, I've more than once mistaken one of Salvo's real ads for a fake one! And I agree, Salvo 5 is their best issue to date.
In any case, Julie, that quote from Emma is interesting for a couple other reasons (at least as I understand it; I haven't read the book): it simultaneously affirms the importance of *relationship* to meaningful criticism, and calls Emma out precisely for her uncharitable *public* criticism.
The important thing, as I see it (and I think Bobby has made this point before as well), is how personal the criticism is: if it's an individual you are criticizing, then if possible you should do so on an individual level, but if it's a publicly espoused idea, you are fully entitled to criticize it publicly. The trouble is when an individual *is* public in their actions, and so might warrant public criticism. In that case it seems best to err on the side of caution, but sometimes a public response is necessary.
My two cents anyway...
Posted by: Ken Brown | June 05, 2008 at 11:30 AM
Thanks Gayle and Ken for your comments about the fake ads...and for saying you think this issue is the best to date. It's certainly a topic that most of us can relate to in one way or another!
Posted by: Julie | June 06, 2008 at 10:52 AM
I would like to encourage our readers to send us letters if they like a given issue of the magazine. The same goes for those who dislike an issue. We really want reader participation and would love to print your comments in the magazine. Please be as specific as possible when writing us, and include your name, city, and state in your letter. The easiest way to write in is via email. Send your comments to me at editor@salvomag.com.
Posted by: Bobby Maddex | June 06, 2008 at 05:35 PM